Beyond The Hype: The True Role of Virtual Assets in Russia Sanctions Evasion

In the intricate dance of global finance and the digital age, the emergence of virtual assets has introduced a new repertoire of moves for both regulators and those seeking to sidestep their grasp. As international sanctions have become a tool of foreign policy, aimed at curtailing activities that threaten global peace and security, the spotlight has increasingly fallen on the role of cryptocurrencies and other virtual assets. This dance is increasingly scrutinized in the context of Russia’s actions on the world stage, particularly following the stringent sanctions imposed in 2022, as Moscow works to circumvent these restrictions.

At the heart of this conversation lies an important question: Can virtual assets effectively fuel a nation’s efforts to evade the financial barricades erected by the international community? So far, there’s little evidence to suggest that Russia has successfully used cryptocurrencies to evade sanctions on a large scale. However, the evolving nature of virtual currencies could potentially offer avenues for individual Russian actors to circumvent these sanctions.

The Appeal of Virtual Assets for Sanctions Evasion

With the onset of stringent sanctions against Russia in 2022, US officials and financial analysts began to speculate about the potential for cryptocurrencies to serve as a means for evasion. The speculation painted a picture of the intrinsic characteristics of virtual currencies—such as anonymity, global reach, ease of transfer, decentralization, and independence from traditional banking systems and regulations—underscoring their potential utility for circumventing global restrictions. Concerns were also raised that Russia may leverage its energy resources to mine bitcoin as a source of revenue.

These scenarios were not merely theoretical as comprehensively and heavily sanctioned countries such as Venezuela, Iran, and North Korea have leveraged virtual assets in both direct and indirect ways to mitigate the impact of sanctions with varying degrees of success.

• Iran legalized cryptocurrency payments for imports to bypass traditional financial systems and avoid using the US dollar, making significant imports without incurring sanctions-related penalties. Bitcoin mining also enabled Iran to utilize its surplus energy resources for mining activities, that generates revenue for its nuclear activities. Despite Iran’s authorization of the use of cryptocurrencies in 2022, the Congressional Research Service assessed last year that US sanctions appear to have had a deleterious impact on Iran’s economy and its defense budget.
• North Korea has engaged in cyberattacks to steal cryptocurrencies, which are then laundered and used to finance the regime’s activities, demonstrating a sophisticated use of virtual assets to supplement lost revenues. According to analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, North Korea since 2015 generated $1 billion in cryptocurrency through cyberattacks by hacking group Lazarus.
• Venezuela in 2018 introduced the Petro, a state-backed cryptocurrency pegged to the country’s oil reserves, in an effort to access international financing and evade sanctions. The token was shut down last month, and its remaining holdings were liquidated.

Initial Skepticism Regarding Virtual Assets and Sanctions Evasion

As the narrative around the potential of virtual assets to facilitate sanctions evasion gained momentum, initial reactions were mixed, with some experts expressing skepticism that cryptocurrencies can be used as a large-scale mechanism for circumventing international sanctions. Early skepticism centered on the sheer scale of Russia’s economy and the comparative liquidity of the cryptocurrency market. Critics argued that the global cryptocurrency market lacked the necessary depth and liquidity to support the transaction volumes required to sustain an economy like Russia’s.

Another cornerstone of the initial skepticism was the technical nature of blockchain technology itself. Contrary to popular belief, blockchain transactions are not entirely anonymous but pseudonymous, with the potential for traceability. Advanced blockchain analytic tools and the public nature of the blockchain ledger allow for the tracking of transactions to their originators, undermining the perceived anonymity touted as ideal for circumventing sanctions. The global regulatory environment and the compliance infrastructure of major virtual currency exchanges also contributed to early doubts. Virtual currency exchanges, particularly those operating in jurisdictions with strict regulatory oversight, have implemented rigorous Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) procedures which could mitigate the risk of significant evasion through virtual assets.

Evolving Perspectives on Evasion Capabilities

Despite initial reservations, the narrative has taken a different turn, challenging early assumptions and underscoring the dynamic interplay between virtual assets and sanctions evasion. Russian state and non-state actors have attempted to use cryptocurrencies to move assets and evade sanctions, and several have been prosecuted for these efforts. However, so far, Russia’s attempts to use cryptocurrencies to evade sanctions on a greater scale have been limited, according to a FinCEN assessment in March 2022 and enforcement actions during the past two years.

• OFAC in November 2023 sanctioned Ekaterina Zhdanova for her role in using virtual currency to launder money on behalf of sanctioned Russian nationals. Zhdanova orchestrated a complex network of transactions utilizing multiple virtual currencies and virtual wallets to obscure the origins and destinations of illicit funds from ransomware, facilitating the evasion of international sanctions for several illicit Russian actors.
• OFAC in 2022 sanctioned a Russian paramilitary group crowdfunding its operations in Ukraine through virtual currencies. The addresses for Task Force Rusich—two bitcoin, two ether, and one tether—collected thousands of dollars in cryptocurrencies, sometimes through exchanges such as Binance and KuCoin.
• The world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, in November 2023 pleaded guilty to money laundering, unlicensed money transmitting, and sanctions violations. Among the company’s violations, OFAC cited 409,295 trades totaling $86,977,789 in virtual currency and futures products between US persons and persons located the embargoed region of Crimea.
• Virtual currency exchange CoinList in December 2023 agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle its potential civil liability stemming from the exchange facilitating transactions for individuals residing in Crimea. It serves as a caution to other digital asset service providers about the critical importance of robust KYC and AML practices.
• FinCEN in January 2023 identified virtual currency exchange Bitzlato Limited as a “primary money laundering concern” in connection with Russian illicit finance. Bitzlato is a virtual currency exchange offering exchange and Peer-to-Peer (P2P) services and maintained significant connections to Russia and to Russian illicit finance through its facilitation of deposits and funds transfers by Russia-affiliated ransomware groups or affiliates, and transactions with Russia-connected darknet markets.

The inherent transparency and permanence of blockchain transactions complicate any large-scale attempts by Russia to use virtual assets for sanctions evasion. With blockchain’s public ledger, transactions, though pseudonymous, are traceable, making anonymity difficult to maintain. Additionally, the limited acceptance of cryptocurrencies as payment means that eventually, cryptocurrencies must be converted to fiat, reintroducing the oversight of traditional financial systems.

Liquidity also poses a significant challenge. The cryptocurrency market does not have the capacity to support the financial needs of a nation under international sanctions, as highlighted by experts like Ari Redbord of TRM Labs. This lack of depth means cryptocurrencies are not a viable solution for Russia’s sanctions evasion.

These constraints underline the limited feasibility of cryptocurrencies as a tool for Russia to sidestep global sanctions. However, on the flip side, digital currencies have played a crucial role in supporting Ukrainian causes, showcasing the potential of digital finance amidst geopolitical strife. Continuous vigilance on the part of stakeholders and cohesive international collaboration to navigate the intricacies and mitigate the risks of abuse brought about by the integration of virtual currencies into the global financial ecosystem can help those in need receive needed support and gain access to the global financial system. The shifting dynamics of this landscape necessitate a proactive approach from all involved parties to safeguard the integrity of the global financial system in an increasingly digital era.