Recent IAR Enforcement Actions

Investment Adviser Representatives (IARs) play a pivotal role in the financial services industry. An investment adviser is an individual or company that is paid for providing advice about securities to their clients. Entrusted with providing sound financial advice and managing client assets, IARs are bound by stringent regulatory standards designed to protect investors and maintain market integrity. Recent enforcement actions by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) underscore the critical importance of adherence to these regulations and highlight the consequences of non-compliance.

In this article we examine four recent enforcement actions and the thematic lessons that IARs can learn.

Unregistered Broker Activity

In January 2025, the SEC settled charges against three IARs—Tamir Shabat, Danny Z. Spiegel, and Joseph J. Orlando Jr.—for acting as unregistered brokers. Between June 2019 and March 2020, these individuals solicited investments for StraightPath Venture Partners LLC, offering interests in limited liability companies purportedly investing in pre-IPO companies. Despite not being registered as brokers, they engaged in activities such as providing marketing materials, advising investors, and receiving transaction-based compensation, which are all activities that fall under the definition of a broker-dealer. Registration as a broker imposes critical regulatory obligations, including disclosure requirements, supervision standards, and duties to act in the investors’ best interests. Operating outside of this framework may deprive investors of these protections. This case emphasizes the necessity for IARs to operate strictly within the bounds of their registration to ensure accountability and safeguard investor trust, and highlights the legal ramifications of unauthorized brokerage activities.

Marketing Rule Violations

The SEC has intensified scrutiny on investment advisers’ marketing practices. In September 2024, nine registered investment advisers faced charges for disseminating advertisements containing untrue or unsubstantiated statements, testimonials, endorsements, or third-party ratings lacking required disclosures. These firms agreed to pay a combined $1.24 million in civil penalties.

Similarly, in April 2024, five additional firms were charged for advertising hypothetical performance without implementing policies to ensure the information was relevant to the intended audience. These actions highlight the SEC’s commitment to enforcing transparency and accuracy in marketing materials, reminding IARs of the imperative to substantiate claims and provide necessary disclosures to prevent misleading investors.

Failure to Disclose Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of interest remain a focal point for regulatory enforcement. In December 2024, the SEC charged Rose Park Advisors LLC and its managing partner, Matthew Q. Christensen, for failing to disclose conflicts arising from Christensen’s familial and financial ties to the CEO of a portfolio company in which their client invested nearly $50 million. The undisclosed relationships included familial connections and financial transactions that could have influenced investment decisions. This case serves as a critical reminder for IARs to identify, disclose, and manage conflicts of interest transparently to uphold their fiduciary duties. As fiduciaries, IARs are legally obligated to act in their clients’ best interests. This duty requires prioritizing the clients’ needs above personal or firm gain and maintaining honest communication.

Inadequate Compliance Policies and Procedures

Robust compliance frameworks are essential for regulatory adherence. These regulations are designed to promote transparency, consistency, and accountability to protect investors, foster trust in the financial system, and reduce the risk of misconduct.

In September 2023, Apexium Financial LP was charged for failing to manage conflicts of interest in line with its firm brochures and for not maintaining adequate compliance policies and procedures. The firm did not document why it determined that using an affiliated firm was in the client’s best interest, despite representing in its brochures that such assessments would be made. Additionally, Apexium neglected to conduct required annual reviews of its compliance policies and procedures in 2018 and 2019. This enforcement action underscores the necessity for IARs to not only establish but also diligently implement and review compliance policies and procedures to ensure alignment with regulatory obligations.

Lessons Learned

These enforcement cases reveal several critical standards in the regulatory landscape for IARs:

1. Scope of Registration: Engaging in activities beyond one’s registered capacity, such as unregistered brokerage, can lead to significant penalties. IARs must clearly understand and operate within the limits of their professional registrations.
2. Marketing Practices: The dissemination of marketing materials requires meticulous attention to accuracy and compliance with SEC regulations. Unsubstantiated claims or inadequate disclosures can mislead investors and result in enforcement actions.
3. Conflict of Interest Management: Transparent disclosure and proper management of conflicts of interest are fundamental to maintaining trust and adhering to fiduciary responsibilities. Failure to disclose pertinent relationships or financial interests can compromise client trust and violate regulatory standards.
4. Compliance Infrastructure: Establishing comprehensive compliance policies and procedures is insufficient without effective implementation and regular reviews. IARs must ensure that their practices consistently align with both internal policies and procedures and external regulatory requirements.

The SEC’s recent enforcement actions serve as a stark reminder of the imperative for IARs to maintain rigorous compliance with regulatory standards. By understanding the requirements of their regulatory obligations—whether in marketing, managing conflicts, or compliance infrastructure—IARs can safeguard their reputations, protect investor interests, and contribute to the overall integrity of the financial system.

Looking Ahead

It is important to note that we may see some shifts in future regulations and enforcement as a result of the change in administration in early 2025 and the changes in regulatory focus. Indications are that there may be a shift in the SEC’s priorities toward capital formation, which includes creating an environment that facilitates businesses’ access to funding through public and private markets. We are also seeing renewed emphasis on traditional enforcement areas such as material misstatements and insider trading. The SEC is also intensifying its efforts in regulating crypto assets through a newly-formed task force and adjusting its stance on recordkeeping, including the handling of off-channel communications.

The SEC’s fiscal year 2024 enforcement actions resulted in record financial remedies, and while enforcement efforts are expected to continue in 2025, the focus may shift in alignment with the new administration’s priorities.