The Heat is On
Global Corruption Indicator Shows Bad News for Climate Action
📅 February 24, 2025
📅 February 24, 2025
The recently released Transparency International (TI) 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) highlights that corruption remains a major global threat. This year’s Index shows that although a number of countries have increased their anticorruption scores, three regions declined in their overall corruption levels, and one has marginally improved. The corruption levels in numerous countries have a damaging effect on efforts to combat climate risk.
Corruption is an evolving global threat that does far more than undermine development – it is a key cause of declining democracy, instability and human rights violations. The international community and every nation must make tackling corruption a top and long-term priority. This is crucial to pushing back against authoritarianism and securing a peaceful, free and sustainable world. The dangerous trends revealed in this year’s Corruption Perceptions Index highlight the need to follow through with concrete action now to address global corruption. — François Valérian, Chair of Transparency International
Although some regions around the world are seeing slight overall improvement, more progress is needed to protect climate-risk mitigation efforts, as well as safeguard the global financial system from abuse. More than 30 countries since 2012 reduced their corruption levels, but the average global score of 43 remains stagnant. Although the CPI noted several improvements, such as The Middle East and North Africa, which raised their regional average score for the first time in more than a decade, the improvements were fragile, with an increase of only one point. The scores for several other regions have declined or remained the same.
Lack of transparency and accountability increases the risk that funds meant to mitigate the effects of climate change will be diverted or embezzled for corrupt gain, threatening the global financial system, according to TI. Non-governmental organization (NGO) OXFAM International last year estimated billions of dollars in financing by the World Bank to fund climate initiatives is unaccounted for. OXFAM reported that its audit of the World Bank’s 2017-2023 climate finance portfolio found that between $24 billion and $41 billion in financing could not be tracked for between the time projects were approved and when they closed.
“The Bank is quick to brag about its climate finance billions—but these numbers are based on what it plans to spend, not on what it actually spends once a project gets rolling… This is like asking your doctor to assess your diet only by looking at your grocery list, without ever checking what actually ends up in your fridge.” — Kate Donald, Head of OXFAM International’s Washington D.C. Office
For several years in a row, TI has highlighted “trouble at the top,” noting that the world’s advanced economies are targets for illicit actors to launder and hide assets. Denmark in 2024 has once again topped the CPI ranking with a 90/100 score, with Finland and Singapore taking second and third place with 88/100 and 84/100 respectively. This does not, however, mean that there’s no risk of corruption in these countries. A high score means that a country is perceived to have low levels of public-sector corruption, but these countries are still exploited by corrupt financial actors.
High-scoring, non-western financial centers such as Hong Kong (74), Singapore (84), and the UAE (68) also warrant closer attention for their increasing roles in facilitating the movement of illicit assets. Although these jurisdictions boast relatively strong rule of law and well-functioning institutions (the UAE was removed from the FATF grey list last year), their banking laws, corporate structures, and secrecy provisions can enable financial criminals to move assets without detection, with real estate being a major tool for laundering illicit funds.
Case Study: Carlos Manuel de Sao Vicente
Angolan businessman Carlos Manuel de Sao Vicente in 2022 was sentenced to nine years in prison for embezzlement, tax fraud, and money laundering. Authorities alleged that Sao Vicente embezzled funds from business conducted with foreign oil companies operating in the country. Sao Vicente had an account at the Bank of Singapore containing more than $558 million and two accounts at the same bank registered to his wife and his son, which had more than $15 million combined.
A judge in November denied Sao Vicente’s request to unfreeze $2.6 million for his legal expenses, citing the difficulty in assessing the extent of Sao Vicente’s wealth because of numerous transfers of funds between his bank accounts and the international nature of his assets.
Sao Vicente, the son-in-law of Angola’s first president, had accounts in the UK, Switzerland, and Singapore and owned or controlled numerous companies in Angola, the UK, Bermuda, and Portugal.
Bank accounts in Hong Kong, Switzerland, the UK, the UAE, the United States, and other high-scoring countries are used to pay bribes and move or store illicit proceeds, with corrupt officials from Africa often using financial centers with high CPI scores as destinations for misappropriated funds. TI last year found that more than $3.7 billion in funds linked to corruption from Africa were found hidden in wealthy nations, such as the UK, using anonymous entities.
Financial institutions and other firms in high-scoring jurisdictions should monitor transactions that may be linked to corruption in lower-scoring countries. Luxury purchases and real estate in these financial centers often face less scrutiny precisely because of their high anticorruption scores.
When possible, beneficial ownership of accounts and companies should be determined, and transactions involving secrecy jurisdictions that have lax disclosure requirements for ownership or control should warrant closer scrutiny.
The Basel Institute on Governance recommends that financial integrity professionals gain a better understanding of methods used to move proceeds of corruption, including how methodologies to launder money, such as the use of shell companies, offshore financial centers, and informal value transfer service providers, can also be used to “dirty funds.”
Closely examine transactions tied to the green minerals sector that involve lithium, cobalt, copper, nickel, and rare earth minerals and that is known for vulnerability to corruption. Ties to government officials, the use of unnecessary or unqualified middlemen, and countries with weak controls over resource management could indicate corruption.
This year’s Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index shows that although a number of countries have increased their anticorruption scores, three regions declined in their overall corruption levels and only one has improved. The corruption levels in numerous countries have a damaging effect on efforts to combat climate risk.
For further reading, check out our article The Green Gold Rush on corruption risks in the green transition mining and minerals industry.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsHide notification onlySettingsWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.
Privacy Policy